[hercules-390] Hercules 3.12 with intel compiler

[[e-mail] [hercules-390]]

Guess what the Hercules I built with Visual Studio 2012 on my Windows 8.1 machine the Hercules.exe is 25,600 (I have some of my own code in there)


On Windows 10 with the intel compiler 29,696 the way I know its intel I inserted __asm for debug 64 Microsoft doesn't allow that

[Ivan Warren [e-mail] [hercules-390]]

Post by ***@gmail.com [hercules-390]
Guess what the Hercules I built with Visual Studio 2012 on my Windows
8.1 machine the Hercules.exe is 25,600 (I have some of my own code in
there)
On Windows 10 with the intel compiler 29,696 the way I know its intel
I inserted __asm for debug 64 Microsoft doesn't allow that

Joe,

What do these figures represent ? Are these the size of the executable ?

They represent very little value. The bulk of the hercules code is in
hengine.dll

--Ivan


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Joseph Reichman [e-mail] [hercules-390]]

In that case intel/windows 10 4,751,360 VC++ windows 8.1 4,755,968


This is debug/X64

Basically just googling says that for plain ( non windows code ) I guess like hercules intel is faster
+ you can write inline Assembler under 64 bit

For Windows type programs VC++ is better faster

Post by Ivan Warren ***@vmfacility.fr [hercules-390]

Post by ***@gmail.com [hercules-390]
Guess what the Hercules I built with Visual Studio 2012 on my Windows
8.1 machine the Hercules.exe is 25,600 (I have some of my own code in
there)
On Windows 10 with the intel compiler 29,696 the way I know its intel
I inserted __asm for debug 64 Microsoft doesn't allow that

Joe,
What do these figures represent ? Are these the size of the executable ?
They represent very little value. The bulk of the hercules code is in
hengine.dll
--Ivan
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]